Paldo ang Court of Appeals..

 3.25.2026 #onlinediary

ayos... supporter ako ni tukayo BBM, pero prang nawawalan ako ng gana now..

1st. bakit ayaw pa nya pirmahan yung bill sa pagalis ng excise tax sa fuel kahit pa temporary lang?, to alleviate the sufferings of our people, albeit temporary.. halos ₱10/liter for gasoline ang mababawas sa price if maalis to.. Mukhang pinipigilan ni Vatman ah...

2. Kahit sino namang PUV driver titigil sa pagbyahe.. Nagtaas na ng pamasahe LTFRB at oks lang naman sa mga tao yun dahil we understand the situation. Bat isuspend pa? If hindi mo yan itaas, sino pa babyahe? mas lalo mahihirapan ang mga tao..

3.. Now eto free na mawidraw at madispose ng mga kuracaught yung mga assets nila

--

Me thinking loud: Ano ba meron sa ayuda at instead na alisin excise tax pra lahat is makinabang, is puro ayuda ayuda na hindi rin naman magtatagal..

Also, kaya hindi nako nanoood ng eat bulaga kahit sa youtube, kahit gusto ko panoorin yung Sugod bahay dun dahil natatawa ako kina wally at jose.. prang hindi ko kaya mastomach yung makita na nagpapatawa yung isang ex idol ko dun na naghohost parin sa eat bulaga..

 

 

 

 

 

Individuals and firms linked to the flood control scandal may now regain access to previously frozen assets after the Anti-Money Laundering Council’s (AMLC) initial freeze order expired and was not extended.

According to a Bilyonaryo.com source, the case, docketed as CA GR-AMLA 00432, saw the AMLC seek an extension of the freeze order on March 12, but the Court of Appeals denied the request in a resolution dated March 16, 2025.

With the denial, the freeze order has effectively lapsed, theoretically allowing account holders to withdraw or move their assets, subject to standard regulatory checks.

The AMLC earlier disclosed that it had secured the freeze order on September 16, 2025, covering 135 bank accounts and 27 insurance policies tied to individuals and corporations under investigation for suspected anomalies in flood control projects.

The petition, filed a day earlier in coordination with the Office of the Solicitor General, aimed to support a broader probe into alleged money laundering activities and identify all parties involved.

While the AMLC did not publicly name those covered, the report said the initial freeze order included individuals and entities such as Henry Alcantara, Bryce Hernandez, SIMS Construction, Wawao Builders, Engineer Mendoza, and Sally Santos, among others.

Among them, Alcantara and Santos are considered state witnesses in the flood control probe, according to the Department of Justice.

Accounts covered by the freeze order spanned major commercial banks, insurance firms, the state-run Land Bank of the Philippines, and several rural banks.

Under anti-money laundering rules, the AMLC may seek a freeze order upon establishing probable cause that assets are linked to unlawful activity. Such orders are effective for 20 days unless extended by the Court of Appeals. If an extension is sought within the prescribed period, the freeze remains in effect until the court resolves the request.

In this case, however, the denial of the extension effectively lifted the restrictions.